Silent House

Release date: March 9, 2012
Directed by: 
Chris Kentis & Laura Lau
Written by: Laura Lau
Cast: Elizabeth Olsen, Adam Trese, Eric Sheffer Stevens, Julia Taylor Ross, Adam Barnett, Haley Murphy

I’ve always been taught to never expect much from remakes, and I can’t say I expected much from Silent House. Luckily for me, Elizabeth Olsen’s acting and the atmosphere that this movie manages to create was enough to keep me watching.

Sarah, her father, and her uncle are in the process of renovating her family’s lakeside house to prep it for sale. It doesn’t take long for the strange noises to begin, and once the key to the only way out goes missing things begin to take a turn for the worse for Sarah.

The story, regardless of its relatively predictable nature, is not particularly bad. However, Laura Lau’s screenplay, based on the Uruguayan film La Casa Muda by Gustavo Hernandez, isn’t very good either. With what little dialogue there was, one would expect it to be well written at the very least, but it was mostly stale work. Some of it was even laughably bad from how stupid it sounded, especially when coming from an adult. While this bogs down the movie a bit, there is at least plenty to look forward to on the technical side.

The way its shot really adds more to the atmosphere and the story than the dialogue does because the darkness, tight framing, and the focus on Elizabeth Olsen’s face really works perfectly to add to the claustrophobic feeling that comes with the movie. The camerawork started off a bit obnoxiously, as if whoever was handling it really didn’t know how the fuck to hold it even remotely steady, but it progressively improved — with exception for when they were attempting to follow Elizabeth Olsen running.

In terms of the editing, a few of the cuts stood out more than others — much like in Hitchcock’s Rope — but it’s definitely a fine attempt at making it look like the film was shot in one full take. The use of lighting throughout was well done, and the involvement of minor surrealist aspects in the set design in certain scenes was impressive. I might even go as far as to say that if The Navidson Record (from Danielewski’s novel House of Leaves) were to ever take film form, Chris Kentis and Laura Lau might just do a good job.

As for Elizabeth Olsen, between her work in Martha Marcy May Marlene and this, there’s no denying this girl is a star. Few people know how to convey a feeling of true fear, but with some stunning facial work Olsen pulls it off. The close-ups of her face, which happen frequently in this movie, are wonderfully done, and just hearing her uneven breathing pumps up the tension. The rest of the cast, unfortunately, isn’t very good, except for maybe Julia Taylor Ross, who gave quite the curious performance in her little screen time.

Silent House is not the best horror movie, but it’s certainly not the worst either. It’s just an average flick with a great performance from Elizabeth Olsen and some interesting technical work. To me, it’s an experiment that paid off but could have been executed better. I’d say give it a shot, if only to stare at Olsen’s face for 88 minutes on the big screen.

Rating: ★★★☆☆ 

Juan Barquin

Just yer average twenty-something college student with no time on his hands who ends up watching (and writing) too many movies and shows for his own good.

11 Responses

  1. amy says:

    Haha, I actually didn’t like La Casa Muda all that much either except for the nice production value. 30 min. in – I was out… literally fell asleep. O_O

  2. Camiele says:

    When I first saw the preview for this I thought it looked familiar. The Silent House = La Casa Muda… such a Spanish fail on my part. But, yeah. I was watching thinking, “Now, wait. I could’ve sworn this movie came out already…?” HaHa.

    I wonder if it’s actually worth to see. Me and you both, Juan, have a quick and ready aversion to remakes… HaHa.

    • amy says:

      @Camiele, actually — Juan has a more open look at remakes *cough if they’re by Fincher cough* LOL I think it’s me you’re referring to. xD

      • Camiele says:

        @amy, AH! Well, there ya go. Kindred originals-only-please Spirits. :)

      • Juan Barquin says:

        @amy, I take offense to your comment! Again – as I’ve always attempted to explain – David Fincher’s film is NOT a remake. This might sound rude, but I think it’s downright stupid to consider that a remake. They’re two separate movies that adapt from the same source material. Had TGWTDT been an original screenplay, then YES – it would have been a remake, but it’s not. Just like Let Me In & Let The Right One In.

        Also, I only say that I don’t expect much from remakes. I’m not an originals only guy only because sometimes – On rare occasion – the remake tends to be far better. My favorite example of this happens to be “A Star Is Born” because it has both good and bad. The original 1937 film is pretty good. The 1954 remake however with Judy Garland is near perfect. And then we have the 1976 remake with Barbra Streisand which happens to be pretty mediocre.

        • amy says:

          @Juan Barquin, we should have a feature on what constitutes a remake, a re-adaptation, and when a re-adaptation is conveniently timed to ride on the hype of the first adaptation xD

      • Rodrigo says:

        @amy, And Arthur too (Russell Brand version).

        • Camiele says:

          @Rodrigo, Wait, what? I don’t quite understand your comment. If you’re saying that Arthur is a remake, then yes. If you’re saying that Russel Brand’s version is better than Dudley Moore’s… :SMACKS YOU HARD IN THE FACE: WHAT THE HELL??!?!??!!?

          HaHA. Anyway, you do make a good point, Juan. Some remakes do, actually, outshine the original. Rare an occasion it may be, it does happen.

        • Rodrigo says:

          @Camiele, I haven’t seen both versions of Arthur yet. I was just saying that Juan liked the new version. “Arthur isn’t the best comedy out this year, but it’s fun and worth a watch if you enjoy a sweet story with a good amount laughs.”

        • Juan Barquin says:

          @Rodrigo, Yeah, I like both of ’em actually. I prefer the earlier one, but Brand’s isn’t all that bad – although I blame that on my adoration for Greta Gerwig and Helen Mirren who were both perfect in it.

  3. Camiele says:

    @Juan Barquin, well… I mean, Helen Mirren can make anything perfect. So, I guess I get where you’re coming from there… HaHa.

Leave a Reply to Camiele Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.