Original Title: 悪人
Alternate English Title: Villain
Release date: September 11, 2010
Director: Sang-il Lee
Novel by: Shuichi Yoshida
Screenplay by: Shuichi Yoshida, Sang-il Lee
Cast: Satoshi Tsumabuki, Eri Fukatsu, Akira Emoto, Kirin Kiki, Masaki Okada, Kimiko Yo, Hikari Mitsushima

Sang-il Lee is an easy-to-hate director, having directed the saccharine Hula Girls, Lee is neither as stylish as Tetsuya Nakashima (Confessions), nor unbelievably cool like Takashi Miike (13 Assassins) or old school like Yoji Yamada (About her Brother). Of course, they all competed for the honor of being the “best Japanese film of the year” and for a spot to represent Japan at the last edition of the Academy Awards.

Sang-il Lee’s Akunin had a lot to live up to, and I’m glad to say that it actually kind of… works. It tells the story of Shimizu (Tsumabuki), a quiet and rather inadequate young man who meets a girl online — Yoshino (Mitsushima) who just sees him as a guy to pass the time and take advantage of as she waits for her big catch… Keigo (Okada), who is a total jerk.

Yoshino doesn’t care that Keigo treats her like crap because he’s handsome, cool and is loaded. One night, when Yoshino is supposed to meet up with Shimizu, she runs into Keigo and immediately latches onto him. The next day, Yoshino shows up dead.

As Shimizu fulfills the role of the dutiful “son” to his grandparents, he meets Mitsuyo (Fukatsu) online — both seem genuinely interested in each other, but everything turns for the worse when he’s on the run.

Akunin is a crime drama, however, unlike the crimes we’re used to watching, this has little to do with finding out who did it and more about why this person did it. It’s the same basic idea as Confessions, but unlike that film in which the style overpowered the story, Akunin is just about these characters. Is our “villain” really a horrible person? Is the audience required to sympathize with the killer? Throughout the film, yes. It seems like we are given the right situations to feel like we have to side with this person, but the ending seems to be clear.

Except for both the youngest characters on the film, who seem to be just elements to make the protagonist more relatable, people like Shimizu’s grandmother (Kiki) and Yoshino’s father (Emoto) feel really real and put us in their position. What would one do if a member of your family is accused of murder, or what would you do to the person that just left them there?

A film like Akunin raises a lot of questions, and doesn’t necessarily answer them. This actually enhances the experience of watching the film, which doesn’t have cool visuals or striking colors. There’s no action suspense, or horrible people having a turnaround to become better people. The movie is bleak and it gets bleaker, there are glimmers of hope, but they’re just that — glimmers. In the end, the story is all about the choices these people make, and the consequences that these bring.

Rating: ★★★★☆ 


YAM Magazine editor, photographer, blogger, translator and part-time web designer. Film junkie, music junkie… and lately series (a.k.a. TV) junkie.

3 Responses

  1. Giacomo Lee says:

    Saw this today. Was great for the first hour, hour and a half, and then went off rails:

    – so the girl threatened to report the killer to the police for rape and kidnap? For no reason but to suddenly get us on the bad guy’s side in one big leap? Very heavy-handed
    – that idiot’s party after being cleared of all charges seemed just a little *too* popular and jovial
    – the slow-motion shots and sweaty sex scene – i couldnt help but laugh
    – did drag on a bit, didnt it?

    And I was a little comfortable with the depiction of women. They were all victims of crime, and came off a desperate, slutty or pantomime selfish (the killer’s mother, oh god!)

    • amy says:

      @Giacomo Lee, I don’t think it was for no reason. I mean, it is hinted at through the whole film that she’s a pretty difficult girl. But yeah, both the younger characters are treated as tools for us to sympathize with the villain… but are we supposed to really? I think the film does this to make the audience side with him to then tell us that we’re pretty bad ourselves.

      I do agree on Masaki Okada’s part – I think he’s been playing a lot of idiots lately on film (like in Confessions too). It was weird to see him laughing it off with his friends after he’s been accused of such a thing. In reality, he’d probably be an outcast… but then again, he’s supposed to be loaded, so maybe those guys didn’t care.

      To be honest, I wasn’t expecting the sweaty sex scene either, which was really awkward watching with my dad (like, super shocking and awkward LOL). Maybe an implied scene followed by the money shot would have sufficed, but I’ve only seen the film once so I can’t pinpoint if it had any other meaning. It’s not like it was sexy or anything xD

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.